20150310

Tuesday 10th of March 6:20 a.m. 2015 Question, how does the context of sin change for both the individual and society when the sin is uncovered? Example; a person routinely takes home objects from their work that are semi-considered surplus, that might be thrown away, or could be recycled and reused within the company. Person A is never found out about, Person B realizes that they have been recorded on video. Thoughts? I have my own views but I'd like to hear other peoples. The literalist religious view says that there is no difference between the one person and the other because sin is sin. The logical side of me says that there must be a difference and there has to be a difference between the two; for Person A whether he or she felt it was wrong to begin with would feel more deeply the consequence? Of actions hand so that brings up the question as to whether or not everything should be brought to life or not it seems to have only consequence for this life whether or not to make society better as a whole . Person A may feel that these actions are of no consequence so would feel that there's no harm in it Person A may also feel that it's wrong and they shouldn't be doing it, but nevertheless continues. Person B may feel that it's wrong or there's nothing wrong with it, just as Person A does. But does the fact that it is brought to light and scrutinized, then make it become something more than it originally was does? person be if they feel that it was wrong to begin with and feel that they should stop and then it is brought to light, now they are "forced to repentance"